High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohammad Imran vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 31 December 2024 · Citation: (2024) 12 UK CK 0088

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 143 · Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 — Section 3, 4, 5, 6
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2511 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 162 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 583 of 2024, under Section 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 3, 4, 5, 6 of The

Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence. He has been shown as a customer.

4.

Learned State counsel admits that the applicant has been shown as a customer when raid was conducted.

5.

Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Court concerned.