High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohammad Irfan Naseem Akhtar vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0148

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 — 5, 6, 11(1), 11(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1515 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 176 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

Heard Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate, for the applicants and Mr. J.S. Virk, AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.

The applicants are in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No.123 of 2018, which has been registered under Sections 5, 6, 11 (1) and 11 (2) of

the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, at Police Station â€" Kunda, District-Udham Singh Nagar.

Considering the overall evidence, which is presently available before this Court and the fact that the applicants are in jail since 08.07.2018, prima facie,

the applicants have been able to make out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicants be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on their executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to

the satisfaction of the court concerned.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application. It shall not be taken into

consideration at all in any other proceedings.