High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohammad Shamin vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 UK CK 0535

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Purohit, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition Service Single No. 1535 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 121 words

Pankaj Purohit, J

1.

Petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 06.06.2025 (Annexure No.6 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No.2, whereby, petitioner was transferred from Treasury, Udham Singh Nagar to Sub- treasury, Khatima.

2.

It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that pursuant to transfer order, petitioner has already joined in Khatima on 09.06.2025.

3.

Since, impugned transfer order has already been executed and the petitioner has come to this Court after a lapse of one year, therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter exercising its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed in-limine.

5.

Pending application also stands disposed of.