AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 407 wordsDr. Kauser Edappagath, J
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS) seeking regular bail.
The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.685/2020 of Kottayam West Police Station, Kottayam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 449, 302, 394, 397, 461 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
The prosecution case, in short, is that with intention of committing theft of valuable articles from the house of the deceased persons, the applicant trespassed into the same, on 01.06.2020 by about 8.40 a.m. and attacked the owner of the house, by name Abdul Sali, by using a frame of teapoy on his head repeatedly. When his wife Sheeba Sali attempted to prevent the crime, she was also attacked with frame on her head. The said Sheeba Sali succumbed to death then and there and Abul Sali passed away later in the hospital. In order to ensure death, the applicant had conducted electric power through the body of the deceased persons. Thereafter, gold ornaments worth Rs.7,78,000/-, apart from Rs.5,000/- Samsung, OPPO mobile phones etc. were stolen by the applicant and thereby committed the offences.
I have heard Sri.J.Abhilash, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.C.K.Suresh, the learned Special Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Special Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.
The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 28.05.2025. A perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. This is a case of double murder, and the manner in which the murder was committed is brutal in nature. Considering the nature of the crime, the gravity of the offence, the complicity of the applicant in it, and the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am of the view that the applicant cannot be released on bail at this stage. The bail application, accordingly, is dismissed.
