High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohammed Usman Baig vs Sultan Mumtaz Begum & Ors.

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 20 May 2025 · Citation: (2025) 05 KAR CK 0392

HON’BLE JUDGES
E.S. Indiresh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(6)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 3983 Of 2024 (GM-CPC)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 94 words

C M Joshi, J

1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing the petition and has filed a memo dated 20.05.2025. The memo reads as follows:-

MEMO

"The petitioner in the above case begs to state as follows:-

The petitioner submits that this hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to take all the contentions raised that parties have settled the matter, in the interest of justice and equity".

2.

Hence, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.