High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohan Chandra Joshi vs S. Ramaswamy & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 13 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0209

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 399 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 151 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

WPSS No. 723 of 2014, filed by the petitioner, was allowed by Writ Court vide judgment dated 10.12.2015 and mandamus was issued to the

respondent authorities to give pensionary benefits to the petitioner by treating that he has put in ten years of qualifying service.

2.

In this contempt petition, petitioner has contended that the direction issued by Writ Court has not been complied with.

3.

A compliance affidavit has been filed by Mohd. Gulfam Ahmad, Chief Treasury Officer, Almora. In para 5 of the said affidavit it has been stated

that a sum of ₹4,57,670/- has been paid to the petitioner towards retiral benefits on 13.07.2018.

4.

In view of the statement made in the compliance affidavit, filed by opposite party no. 6, nothing survives in this contempt petition.

5.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.