AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
This petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the Rent
Tribunal Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur to decide at an early date the eviction
application No.1028/2005 (1/2013), titled Mohan Lal Verma & Others Vs.
Rajendrra Prasad Shah filed under the provisions of Rent Control Act,
2001 (hereinafter `2001 Act'').
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner applicant-
landlord filed eviction application under Section 9 of the 2001 Act on 8-
11-2005. After service, counsel for the non applicant appeared and filed
reply on 4-1-2006. Thereafter the case is still pending. Counsel submitted
that Section 15(5) of the 2001 Act provides for disposal of eviction
application within 240 days from service of notice on opposite party.
Reference has been made to Section 21(4) of the 2001 Act which provides
that adjournment by the Rent Tribunal can be granted only on an
application in writing therefor decided by a reasoned order. Yet
adjournments are granted on the mere askance. And the non-applicant-
tenant resorts to frivolous applications to stall the progress in the eviction
petition.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the
material available on record as also the provisions of the 2001 Act, I find
that the prayer sought for is reasonable. The Rent Tribunal is directed to
expeditiously decide the application filed by the petitioner and in any
event not later than three months from the date of receipt of the certified
copy of this order. In the process, the provisions of Section 21(4) of the
2001 Act be adhered to. It is further directed that in the event of filing of
frivolous application the same be decided on the same day or the following
day by a reasoned and speaking order, and when necessary cost be also
imposed as a measure of regulation of court proceedings.
The writ petition stands allowed accordingly.
