AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
2 paragraphs · 119 wordsV. Ramaswami, C.J.—Notices could not be served on the parties as it is reported that they are not living on the addresses given earlier in the petition. However, we do not think it necessary to delay this matter any further as the respondent was ex parte in the Court below and there was no need for actually serving the respondent again. Accordingly, the service of the notices is dispensed with.
The finding of the learned Additional District Judge is that the respondent was living in adultery with one Kala Masih and that there was no collusion between the husband and wife. Accordingly, the decree of dissolution of marriage by divorce granted by the Additional District Judge is confirmed.