AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 221 wordsVivek Bharti Sharma, J
Applicant Mohasin, who is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.15 of 2023, under Sections 395, 397 & 34 of IPC, Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on file.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant crime; that, no specific role has been assigned to the applicant; that, the co-accused Amjad has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 16.05.2023 and the applicant/accused is also entitled to be released on bail on the basis of parity.
Learned D.A.G. appearing for the State would fairly submit that it is a case of parity and the applicant/accused may be granted bail on this sole ground.
In view of the above, but, without expressing any opinion about merits of the case before the Trial Court, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case for bail on the ground of parity.
The bail application is, accordingly, allowed. Let the applicant be released on furnishing bail bond with two sureties in the amount of ₹50,000/- and personal bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.