High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohd Shahad Ansari vs State Of M.P And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 10 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 MP CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hirdesh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 217 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 118 words

@JUDGEMENTTAG- JUDGEMENT

Hirdesh, J

1.

Heard on I.A.No.2362/2024 an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. The delay is of 19 days.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed. The delay in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.

3.

The present MCC has been filed for restoration of W.P.No.19759/2023, which was dismissed for non-compliance of common conditional order passed by this Court.

4.

For the reasons stated in the present restoration application, sufficient cause is made out to restore W.P.No.19759/2023. Accordingly, the present MCC is allowed and W.P.No.19759/2023 is directed to be restored to its original number.

5.

Let a copy of this order be kept in W.P.No.19759/2023.