High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohit Goyal vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 13 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 UK CK 0079

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.C. Khulbe, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 69 Of 2022, Compounding Application (IA/1 Of 2022)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 206 words

R.C. Khulbe, J

1.

By way of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks to quash the FIR No.0426 of 2021, registered

under Section 323, 504, 354 IPC at P.S. Sitarganj, District U.S. Nagar.

2.

The parties have filed the above-numbered compounding application to show that they have buried their differences and have settled their disputes

amicably.

3.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the compounding application.

4.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that all the offences i.e. 323, 504 and 354 IPC are compoundable offences as per the Scheme

given in Section 320 Cr.P.C.

5.

The parties are present before the Court through video conferencing being identified by their respective counsel; the informant fairly submits that a

compromise has taken place in this case; the FIR was lodged under some misconception; and she does not want to pursue the matter against the

petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings, mentioned hereinabove, pending between the parties are hereby quashed

qua the present petitioners on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

7.

Present writ petition is disposed of, as above.

8.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.