AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 235 wordsSuresh Kumar Kait, J
Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No. 546/2016 dated 13.08.2016, registered at Police Station - Sarai Rohilla and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.
Notice issued.
Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.
With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
Complainant/Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and she has been identified by SI S.K. Jha/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed/Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.01.2020.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present petition may be allowed.
Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.
For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 546/2016 dated 13.08.2016, registered at Police Station - Sarai Rohilla and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.
The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
Order dasti.