High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohsin vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 April 2025 · Citation: (2025) 04 UK CK 0857

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302, 394, 411
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 636 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 145 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No. 77 of 2021, in FIR No. 293 of 2020, under Sections 302, 394, 411, 34 IPC, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that it is a case of parity. The co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.

4.

These facts are admitted by learned State counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.