High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 01 GAU CK 0076

MONJURA BEGUM BARBHUIYA vs THE STATE OF ASSAM and ORS

Gauhati High Court · Decided on 25 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajit Singh, Manojit Bhuyan
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
326 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 326 words
1.

This intra court appeal is directed against the order dated 17.8.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this High Court, whereby he has

dismissed appellant''s WP(C) No.5774/2012.

2.

On 1.9.1990, the appellant was appointed as a Muster Roll Worker against the post of Office Peon under the establishment of Sub-Divisional

Agricultural Officer, Sonai, Cachar. The State Government, vide order dated 3.10.2005, took a decision to regularize the services of Muster Roll

Workers under the said establishment, who were engaged prior to 1.4.1993. In compliance of the said decision, Director of Agriculture, vide

order dated 5.10.2005, regularised the services of appellant and other similarly situated workers on a condition that posts shall be ""personal"" and

the same will be abolished as soon as incumbents will relinquish the posts. In the order of regularization, it was also stipulated that such posts shall

not be filled up by any other persons except the Muster Roll Workers for whom the posts have been created. The appellant was thus regularised

on a ""personal ex-cadre post"". Thereafter, the appellant made a prayer for her promotion to Class-III post which was rejected by the Department.

Aggrieved, the appellant filed WP(C) No.5774/2012 and the learned Single Judge has dismissed the same by the impugned order. It is in this

backdrop, the appellant has filed the present appeal.

3.

As mentioned above, the appellant was engaged as a Muster Roll Worker on a Class-IV post (Office Peon). She was, therefore, regularised on

the same Class-IV post. And the post was created specifically for her as personal ex-cadre post. Her post is admittedly outside the cadre of

Class-IV post. Since the appellant has not been encadred in the feeder cadre for Class-III post, she is not entitled for promotion. The learned

Single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition of the appellant. The impugned order is well founded and does not suffer from any illegality. The

appeal has no merit and is accordingly dismissed.