High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 04 JH CK 1296

Most Meena Devi, W/o Late Ganesh Singh vs Manager, New India Insurance Company Ltd

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 2 April 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Appeal No.353 Of 2016

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 324 words

Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J

1.

The appellants/ claimants are in appeal for enhancement of the compensation amount awarded by learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Hazaribagh, in Claim Case No.220 of 2010 under Section 166 of the M.V. Act for the death of one Ganesh Singh, who died in a motor vehicle accident while driving a motorcycle being JH 02F 2934 which met with an accident with Tractor bearing registration no.JH 02G 6241.

2.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants/claimants that learned Tribunal has not awarded compensation under the head of future prospect and further only Rs.3300/- has been taken as monthly income of the deceased.

3.

Learned counsel for the owner of the offending vehicle/respondent no.2 has submitted that liability under the conventional head has been granted as Rs.2,25,000/- which is not as per the settled law.

4.

Accordingly, final compensation will work out taking age of the deceased to be 43 years and Rs.39,600/- as Annual income, 1/3rd as personal and living expense while taking three dependents and multiplier as 14, as such, the final compensation amount will be as under :-

Annual Income

Rs.39,600/-

Annual  dependency  after  deducting 1/3rd  ie Rs.13,200/-on the living and personal expenses of the deceased

Rs 26,400/-

Loss  of  dependency  on  taking  a multiplier of 14

Rs.3,69,600/-

Future prospect @ 25%

Rs. 92,400/-

Conventional head

Rs.84,000/-

Total

Rs.5,46,000/-

5.

As the compensation of Rs.5,94,600/- awarded by the learned Tribunal, is more than the award which could have been allowed in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi, reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680 and no appeal has been preferred by the Insurance Company against the said award, therefore, instant Miscellaneous Appeal for enhancement of compensation, stands dismissed. Interlocutory Application, if any, is disposed of.

It goes without saying that the amount already paid shall be deducted in final compensation amount.