High CourtsSingle Bench

Most. Monarma Devi vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 25 September 2001 · Citation: (2001) 3 BLJR 2210 : (2001) 4 PLJR 275

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
C.W.J.C. No. 10321 of 2001
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 240 words

Shiva Kirti Singh, J.—Heard the parties.

2.

The issue involved in this case is whether the petitioner who was the only widow entitled for family pension when the employee died during retirement will be entitled for half of the family pension or full family pension amount.

3.

According to stand taken by State of Bihar on the basis of letter of Accountant General Bihar to the Treasury Officer, Patna, contained in Annexure-4 since the deceased employee had two wives, therefore, notionally the first wife was entitled for half of the family pension and since the first wife died issueless hence her notional share in family pension will revert to the State of Bihar and will not be available to the other widow or issue of the deceased employee from the second widow.

4.

The aforesaid stand of the State of Bihar is not based on any provisions of law. Factually also since at the time of death of the deceased employee the petitioner was the only widow with children it was not the case of two widows being available to share the proceeds the family pension. In such circumstances the claim of the petitioner to receive full family pension as per scheme of family pension must be allowed. The writ application is accordingly allowed. All the consequential benefits and arrears must be paid to the petitioner within three months from the date of production/communication of a copy of this order.