High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 SIK CK 0036

M/S Alkem Health Science vs Union Of India & Anr

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 25 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 42 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 170 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

Heard Mr. Mahesh Bhagwan Raichandani learned counsel for the petitioner at length. Also heard Mr. Ajay Rathi, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. All the points raised by the petitioner can be raised before the Appellate Forums provided in the Central Excise Act, 1944. The learned counsel for the petitioner on receipt of instructions from his client desires to avail of the alternative remedy available to challenge the impugned order in original No.10/Adj/CE/ALKEM HEALTH/Gtk-Div/2021-22 dated 30.07.2021 as well as the show cause-cum-demand notice C No.V(18) 104/CE/Ref/Alkem Health/Gtk-DIVN/2017-18/347 dated 02.03.2020. The learned counsel prays that the time spent in pursuing the present writ petition may be favorably considered by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) when the appeal is filed. The petitioner may file the appeal within a period of 15 days hence. On so doing, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) may consider favorably the time spent by the petitioner in pursuing the present writ petition and decide the appeal on merits. The writ petition stands disposed as withdrawn.