High CourtsSingle Bench

M/S Amit Sales Corporation Pvt Ltd vs M/S Amg Infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court · Decided on 23 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 DEL CK 0221

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138
CASE NUMBER
Civil Suit (COMM) No. 283 Of 2016
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

48 paragraphs · 894 words

Manmohan, J

1.

Present suit has been filed for recovery of Rs. 1,11,04,928/-along with pendente lite and future interest @ 24% per annum.

2.

It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff-company deals in business of supply of steel pipes and tubes of various types and had been supplying

goods/materials to the defendant-company for its various projects as per its demand from time to time since 23rd April, 2012 against purchase orders.

3.

It is further stated in the plaint that the plaintiff-company had been maintaining a running account for the goods supplied and the payments received

from the defendant-company and as per the said running account, a sum of Rs. 89,84,570/- is outstanding as on 8th January, 2014 against the

defendant-company for the goods supplied by the plaintiff.

4.

Mr. T.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the plaintiff-company states that despite making several requests, the defendant-company on one pretext or

the other kept on postponing the same and has failed to pay the outstanding dues till date.

5.

Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that pursuant to follow ups by the plaintiff-company, the defendant-company admitted its liability and issued

three cheques towards part payment of the aforesaid outstanding amount. However, on account of false promises of payment by the defendant-

company, the plaintiff did not present the first two cheques due to which their validity of presentation expired. He further states that the third cheque

for a sum of Rs. 50,00,000/- was presented for encashment by the plaintiff on 2nd May, 2013. However, the same was returned unpaid.

6.

Mr. Tiwari, learned counsel for the plaintiff-company states that the defendant thereafter issued another cheque dated 1st February, 2014 towards

part payment of the outstanding amount of Rs. 89,84,570/- . However, the same was returned unpaid vide return memo dated 26th April, 2014 with

remarks “Funds Insufficientâ€​.

7.

He states that the plaintiff-company has already instituted a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in respect of

the said cheque and the same is pending adjudication before the Noida Courts, Uttar Pradesh.

8.

Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff-company also issued a legal notice dated 9th May, 2014 calling upon the defendant to clear

the outstanding admitted amount of Rs. 89,84,570/-. However, despite service of the said notice, the defendant has neither replied to the same nor

cleared the outstanding dues till date.

9.

Since the defendant did not enter appearance despite service, it was proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 4th September, 2017.

10.

The plaintiff has filed its evidence by way of affidavit in support of the averments made in the suit and inter alia relied upon the following

documents:-

(i) Ex. PW1/1 is the copy of Board Resolution dated 29th May, 2014 duly authorising Mr. Amit Gupta to lead evidence in respect of the present suit.

(ii) Mark A are copies of the purchase orders issued by the defendant-company upon the plaintiff for the period between 16th October, 2012 to 6th

January, 2014.

(iii) Ex.PW1/2 (Colly) are the copies of the Tax Invoices raised by the plaintiff upon the defendant for the period between 7th December, 2012 to 8th

January, 2014.

(iv) Ex.PW1/3 is the copy of the statement of ledger account maintained by the plaintiff.

(v) Ex. PW1/4 (Colly) are copies of the cheques issued by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff-company in lieu of part payment of the admitted

dues.

(vi) Ex. PW1/5 is a copy of the criminal complaint along with annexures and evidence filed by the plaintiff under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act.

(vii) Mark B is a copy of the legal demand notice dated 9th May, 2014.

11.

Having perused the paper book, this Court is of the opinion that the defendant placed several purchase orders upon the plaintiff pursuant to which

tax invoices were issued by the plaintiff and corresponding entries to this effect were made in the ledger account maintained by the plaintiff.

12.

This Court is of the view that the outstanding amount of Rs. 89,84,570/- payable by the defendant is clearly reflected in the ledger account

maintained by the plaintiff. Further, the act of the defendant in issuing cheque dated 1st February, 2014 for a sum of Rs. 25,00,000/- in part payment of

the aforesaid outstanding amount and the same being dishonoured vide return memo dated 26th April, 2014 with remarks “Funds Insufficient†are

clearly indicative of the defendant’s mala fide intent of attempting to evade the payments due and payable to the plaintiff-company.

13.

Also, despite issuance of a legal notice dated 9th May, 2014 by the plaintiff calling upon the defendant to clear the outstanding dues, the defendant

has neither replied to the same nor cleared the outstanding dues till date.

14.

As the averments in the plaint have not been rebutted by the defendant in spite of ample opportunities given by this Court, they are deemed to

have been admitted.

15.

Consequently, the present suit is decreed for Rs. 1,11,04,928/-in favour of the plaintiff company and against the defendant along with pendent lite

and future interest @ 8% per annum on the outstanding amount along with costs incurred by the plaintiff. The cost shall amongst others include the

lawyers’ fees as well as the amounts spent on purchasing the court fees. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet accordingly.