Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

M/s. Andritz Hydro Pvt. Ltd. vs CC (Export), New Delhi

Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 25 March 2014 · Citation: (2014) 03 CESTAT CK 0017

HON’BLE JUDGES
D.N. Panda, J · Manmohan Singh, Technical Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Stay Application No. 61492 Of 2013 In Appeal No. 60434 Of 2013
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 144 words
1.

Both sides agree that at the time of adjudication, export obligation certificate was not received by the appellant for which the demand has arisen.

They also agree that if the matter goes back to the learned adjudicating authority, he shall examine the certificate issued by DGFT, (copy of which is

available at page 266 of the appeal folder) and conclude the issue at the grass root level.

2.

In view of above proposition, dispensing the requirement of pre-deposit, appeal is remanded back to the Id. Adjudicating authority to re-adjudicate

the matter taking into account export obligation discharge certificate issued by the DGFT which shall be produced by the appellant. Granting fair

opportunity of hearing to the appellant, learned adjudicating authority shall pass appropriate order.

3.

Both stay and appeal are disposed in the manner indicated above.

(Dictated & pronounced in the open court)