Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 12 NCLT CK 0031

M/s Diamond Engineering Chennai Pvt. Ltd Vs

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 7 December 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Sucharitha, Member (J) · Sameer Kakar, Member, (J)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CP/507/IB/2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 680 words

The  Resolution     Applicant     is     represented     by     the  Ld.  Counsel Mr.  T.K.Bhaskar;   Ld.   RP  Mr.   V.Mahesh  is  present  in  person;  third  party purchaser  is  represented  by the  Ld.  Counsel  Mr.  Ravi  Rajagopalan  through video conferencing mode.

IA/687/2020 IN MA/936/2019:- In this IA, the Counter is not available on record. The Respondent is permitted to file a fresh copy of the Counter in the Registry before the next date of hearing.

List  this  IA/687/2020   IN   MA/936/2019   on  07.01.2022  for  further hearing and disposal.

IA/890/IB/2020 IN MA/75/2020 IN MA/936/2019

MA/60/CHE/2021 IN MA/75/2020 IN MA/936/2019: -

In   IA/890/2020,   Axis  Bank  Ltd  is  represented  by  the   Ld.   Counsel Mr.  Pushkar  and  Ld.  RP Mr.  V.Mahesh is present in  person;  R3  to  R5  are represented by the Ld.  Counsel Mr.  T.K.Bhaskar through video conferencing mode.

In MA/60/CHE/2021 has been filed by Mr. P.Mohanraj, the successful Resolution Applicant /  Corporate Debtor.    These two Applications have been filed for impleading themselves in MA/75/2020.

MA/75/2020 has been filed by State Bank of India seeking a direction for implementation  of the  Resolution  Plan  and the  same was withdrawn  by State   Bank   of  India  under   Memo.   Therefore,   these   two   Applications   i.e., IA/890/IB/2020 and MA/60/CHE/2021 are dismissed as infructuous.

MA/1134/2019: - The Applicant is represented by the Ld. Counsel Mr. Deepesh; R1 and R2 are represented by the Ld. Counsel Mr. T.K.Bhaskar and the  Ld.   RP  Mr.  V.Mahesh  is  present  in  person  through  video  conferencing mode.

Heard the submissions of the parties.   Order reserved.

SR/1057/2020: - This Application has been filed by the Commercial Tax Department.     There was no  representation  on  behalf of the  Department for more than two hearings.

This  Application   has   been   filed   against  the   order   of  the   RP  dated 10.08.2020 which is annexed at page No. 88 of the Application.

Ld.  RP  states that the Applicant herein have not submitted any claim before the RP during the CIRP period.

On    30.09.2019,     the    Resolution    Plan    has    been    admitted    by    this Adjudicating Authority.     No appeal has been filed and hence the Resolution Plan is attained finality.

Subsequently, the Applicant herein submitted the claim which has been rejected by the RP.

Therefore, SR/1057/2020 is dismissed as not maintainable.

IA/1266/1B/2020 IN MA/936/2019: - This Application has been filed by the Axis Bank Ltd against the Resolution Applicant who is the MSME Unit which is taken over by the erstwhile promoters under Resolution Plan and the same was admitted by this Adjudicating Authority on 30.09.2019.

It is an admitted fact that the Resolution Plan could not be implemented and there is a delay in implementation of the Resolution Plan is admitted by all the parties before us.

Ld. RP is the Chairman of the Monitoring Committee and states that out of four properties of Corporate  Debtor,  there are prospective buyers for two properties and there is a possibility to make the plan successful and viable one.

However,  the  State  Bank  of India and  the Axis  Bank  Ltd,  the  two  leading creditors  do  not  approve  the   stand  of  the  Resolution  Applicant  and  very strongly opposes to extension of time for implementation of the plan.

It is also pertinent to mention herein earlier MA/75/2020 was filed by the  State  Bank of India  seeking a direction  to the  Resolution Applicant to implement the plan at the earliest. Subsequently, the State Bank of India has withdrawn MA / 75/2020.

We have heard all the parties.

Liquidation  being the last resort  as repeatedly emphasized in various orders by the Hon'ble NCLAT and the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

We  have  taken  the  suggestions  made  by the  Ld.  RP who  is  also  the Chairman of the Monitoring Committee. The RP is permitted to conduct the stakeholders meeting and discuss about the viability of implementation of the plan and submit the minutes of the meeting before the next date of hearing.

The RP is permitted to conduct more than one meeting, if necessary. List this IA/ 1266/IB/2020 on 07.01.2022 for hearing and disposal. No further adjournment shall be granted in this matter.

All   parties   are   permitted   to   file   compilation,   additional   documents, citations, reply, if any, on or before the next date of hearing.