High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 07 MP CK 0040

M/S Gati Kintetsu Express Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax Of Mp & Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 5 July 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, J · Sunil Kumar Awasthi, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No.12399 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

29 paragraphs · 184 words

From,To,,,,

GSTIN : 27AAE DA945 6D1ZM

SAVA HEATHCARE LIMITED

CFA MIRCOPARK LOGISTICS1ST

FLOOR GATE NO.1232

WADKI, MAHARASHTRA-412308","GSTIN :D9CFE PS825 3Q12F

M/S ANNAPURNA PHARMA

DAYA COMPLEX

OPP. SHRI TALKIES BYPASS ROAD

UTTAR PRADESH -282003",,,,

Mode,"Vehicle/Trans Doc

No. & Dt.",From,"Entered

Date",Entered By,"CEWB No.

(if any)

Road,MH14EM1313,Pune,"25/04/2018

07.49 PM","36AADCG2

096A12Y","141046748

1

Road,MH14EM1313,Bhursungi,"25/04/2018

07.43 PM","36AADCG2

096A12Y",

Road,MH04CG8538 &,Wadki,25/04/2018,27AAECA9,

,"229076818 &

25/04/2018",,03.26 PM,456D1ZM,

obligation to fill the Part-B of the e-way bill and the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court has rightly quashed the order.,,,,,

23.

In the present case, the distance was more than 1200-1300 kilometers and it is mandatory for the petitioner to file the Part-B of the e-way bill",,,,,

giving all the details including the vehicle number before the goods are loaded in the vehicle. Thus, he admittedly violated the provisions of the Rules",,,,,

and Act of 2017 and, learned Authority rightly imposed the penalty and directed the petitioner to pay the same. The order is not in violation of any",,,,,

of the provisions of the Rules and Act of 2017. The writ petition filed by the petitioner has no merit and is accordingly, dismissed.",,,,,