High CourtsSingle Bench

M/S Gokal Chand Jagan Nath Nahar vs Om Prakash & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 23 December 2019 · Citation: (2019) 12 DEL CK 0258

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RC.Revision No. 660 Of 2019, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 50083 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 331 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 20.05.2019, whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondents seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from ground floor of property No.5/7, Desh Bandhu Gupta Road, Paharganj, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition, has been allowed and an eviction order passed.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He further submits that he has instructions on behalf of the petitioner to undertake that petitioner shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.03.2020.

3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner further undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before the petitioner vacates the premises on or before 31.03.2020. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises or any part thereof. He further undertakes that petitioner shall not cause any damage to the tenanted premises and shall hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the tenanted premises in the same condition as it exists today subject to normal wear and tear.

4.

The undertaking is accepted.

5.

Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the undertaking is acceptable to the respondents.

6.

Learned counsels for the parties confirm that the use and occupation charges till 31.03.2020 have already been settled between the parties.

7.

Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

8.

Subject to petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking in the above terms, within a period of two weeks, execution of the impugned order dated 20.05.2019 shall remain stayed till 31.03.2020.

9.

The next date of 12.03.2020 is cancelled.

10.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.