High CourtsDivision Bench

M/s Kundan Singh vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 UK CK 0671

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ · Subhash Upadhyay, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 107
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 492 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 198 words

1) The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief :

"Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 24.09.2024 (Annexure No. 5, Page No. 33-37) for the financial year 2022-23, impugned order dated 19.02.2025 (Annexure No. 6, Page No. 38-43) for the financial year 2023-24 and rejection order for the financial year 2022-23 (Annexure No. 9, Page No. 49-50) and rejection order dated 30.10.2025 (Annexure No. 10, Page No. 51-52) for the financial year 2023-24 pased by State Tax Officer, Almora Sector-1, Haldwani, Uttarakhand."

2) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing appeal under Section 107 of the Act. He, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy.

3) Learned counsel for the Revenue has no objection to the same. She states that even GST registration of the petitioner firm has been cancelled.

4) Be that as it may, since the petitioner is seeking liberty to avail the alternative remedy, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid remedy reserved in favour of the petitioner.

5) Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.