High CourtsSingle Bench

M/s Magnum Glass Works vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 3 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 KL CK 0007

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 4474 Of 2012

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 220 words

P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J

1.

The above writ petition is filed seeking following prayers:

“1. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to produce the entire documents

pertaining to the tender process.

2.

Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the acceptance of the quotations which are over-rated.

3.

Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to conduct the tender process in a

transparent, fair and legal manner by accepting competitive bids in accordance with law, natural justice, equity and the spirit of open competition.

4.

Grant such other reliefs which are incidental to this proceedings in the interest of justice.â€​

2.

When this matter came up for consideration on 22.03.2012, this Court issued the following order:

“When the matter came up for orders, learned counsel for the petitioner sought a stay of supply, pursuant to the contract awarded to respondents 3 to 6.

However,learned counsel for respondents submitted that supply has already been effected. This submission is recorded. Respondent to file counter affidavitâ€​.

In the light of the above submission, nothing survives in this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is closed.