High CourtsDivision Bench

Ms. Neena Sharma and Others vs State of H.P.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 9 January 2012 · Citation: (2012) 01 SHI CK 0035

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · Rajiv Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 50 of 2012-E
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 216 words

Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:-

(i) That the writ in the nature of the mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to extend the benefit of due and admissible merger of 50% Dearness Allowance with basic pay as per memorandum dated 10.6.2005 to the petitioners by further directing the respondents to pay the arrears with all consequential benefits to the petitioners with interest in view of the judgment titled as "Nek Ram Vs State of H.P." i.e. CWP(T) No. 14228/20089.

2.

According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008, titled as Nek Ram & others Versus State of H.P. & others, decided on 17.11.2009. If that be so, similar treatment shall also be extended to the petitioners herein also, as extended to the petitioner in the above referred decision, in case the petitioners are also similarly situated, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and copy of judgment referred to above, by the petitioner concerned before the second respondent.

3.

The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.