Supreme CourtDivision Bench

M/s. Novo Nordisk Pharma India Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 21 September 2016 · Citation: (2017) 291 CurTR 21 : (2016) 389 ITR 134 : (2016) 14 SCC 701 : (2017) 244 Taxman 53

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil R. Dave and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 133
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal Nos. 9616-9617 of 2016 (Arising out SLP (C) No. 25453-25454 of 2012)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 89 words

Anil R. Dave, J.—Leave granted.

2.

It is a fact that the assessee was not heard when the impugned judgment was delivered. We note the fact that even the review petition filed by the appellant before the High Court was also rejected.

3.

In the circumstances, the impugned judgment is set aside and the matters are remitted to the High Court for hearing afresh.

4.

The civil appeals are disposed of as allowed. Pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.