High CourtsSingle Bench

M/S OIX Govtech Private Limited vs Bihar State Industrial Development Corporation Limited

Patna High Court · Decided on 27 October 2021 · Citation: (2021) 10 PAT CK 0033

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Request Case No. 54, 55 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 477 words

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

" That the instant request case is being filed for appointment of an arbitrator for resolving the disputes between the parties pursuant to the Arbitration Agreement, as contained in clause no. 27 of the Agreement for lease of the land for Silk City dated 29th day of May 2020."

Learned counsel for the petitioner invites attention of this Court to the communication dated 01.06.2021 addressed to the Managing Director, Bihar State Industrial Development Corporation Limited (Annexure-17, Page 104).

Clause 27 of the agreement dated 29.05.2020 (Page 29) contains the arbitration clause. The petitioner has fully exhausted the procedure stipulated therein.

Clause for arbitration stands invoked. However, none of the authorities have taken any action. The dispute, civil in nature, emanated from the agreement dated 29.05.2020, entered into between the petitioner and the respondent.

There is no dispute about-(a) the legality, validity and binding effect of the agreement dated 29.05.2020 entered into between the parties to the lis; (b) the existence of arbitration clause contained therein; (c) the existence of dispute(s) arising there from.

The dispute arises out of execution of Agreement dated 29.05.2020. The agreement contained an arbitration clause, whereby the parties agreed for reference of the dispute

inter se the parties, arising out of the said agreement, for arbitration as per law.

There is no legal impediment in the adjudication of the dispute by the learned Arbitrator.

As such, as jointly prayed for, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra, a former Judge of this Court is appointed as learned Arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes arising out of agreement dated 29.05.2020 entered into between the parties to the lis.

All pleas and issues raised, on merits, are left open to be considered and decided by the learned Arbitrator.

Learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee as per the Schedule of the Act.

Since the dispute arises out of an agreement of the year 2020, the hearing be expedited.

Parties undertake to fully cooperate and not take any unnecessary adjournment.

The proceedings, during the time of current Pandemic- Covid-19 shall be conducted through digital mode, unless the parties otherwise mutually agree to meet in person i.e. physical mode.

It is expected of the learned Arbitrator to decide the issues expeditiously.

Joint Registrar (List) is directed to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator.

Learned counsel for the parties also undertake to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator. In fact, they volunteered to appear before him, through digital mode on 22nd of November, 2021 and apprise him of the passing of the order.

Parties shall file their statement of claims before the learned Arbitrator on such date of hearing which he may fix, as per mutual convenience.

The Request Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.