High CourtsDivision Bench

M/s. Ratna Constructions vs State Of Odisha & Ors

Orissa High Court · Decided on 7 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 OHC CK 0067

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J · S.K. Panigrahi, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 99 Of 2013

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 208 words
1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2

2.

None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.

3.

Heard Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate.

4.

Perused the record. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to take a final decision on the grievance and

claim of the petitioner under Annexure-5 within a stipulated period.

5.

Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate stated that the petitioner has made grievance addressing the Chief Minister, Odisha

and on perusal of the said representation, it would reveal that the petitioner claims for payment of price escalation in respect of the work

“Construction of Weir-cum-Submersible Bridge over River Indravati at Ushuripadar-Dahana Road crossing (Balance work)†executed, pursuant

to agreement No.20 F2/2000-01 of Upper Indravati Rehabilitation Division, Khatiguda.

6.

Considering the contentions raised by learned Additional Government Advocate and on perusal of the agreement, it appears that there is arbitration

clause in the agreement itself. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum, in view of arbitration clause of

the agreement.

7.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty as aforesaid.

8.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

.............................................