High CourtsSingle Bench

M/s Sanjay Printing vs State Of Bihar And Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 13 May 2020 · Citation: (2020) 05 PAT CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vikash Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5658 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 632 words

Vikash Jain, J

1.

The present writ petition has been received in this Court by email and assigned to this Bench by Hon'ble the Chief Justice as an extremely urgent

matter for hearing through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that all the defects shall be removed without delay

immediately after the present lockdown ends, and in any event within one month thereof. Learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation expresses

that she has no objection if the defects are removed as proposed and the matter be taken up on merits in view of the stated urgency.

2.

The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner have been claimed in the writ petition â€

“(i) For issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3, the Managing Director, Bihar State Text Book Publishing Corporation

Limited to allot the work of printing test books under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, (Expression of Interest) Tender for the period 2020-21, who had

allotted the work order to the petitioner and tender was signed on 26.03.2018 vide letter no. 1889 dated 20.03.2018 for the period of three years i.e.

2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. Similarly the other printers have been allotted the work on 13.04.2020 and due to this the petitioner is deprived and also

entitled for the work order for the year 2020-21.

(ii) For further direction to the respondents, particularly respondent no. 3 to dispose off the representation filed by the petitioner on 23.04.2020 through

e-mail but till today the same has not been considered as yet and is still pending for final adjudication before the respondent no. 3, The Managing

Director, Bihar State Text Book Publishing Corporation Limited.

(iii) For any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the eye of law.â€​

3.

With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal on merits.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had been allotted work order and tender was signed on 26.03.2018 for a period of

three years namely, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. The petitioner was blacklisted and some payments owing to him have also fallen overdue, which

were made the subject matter of challenge in separate writ petitions. The petitioner is presently aggrieved inasmuch as the work order for the year

2020-21 is not being allotted to him, rather the work has been allotted to other persons. In this regard a representation dated 23.04.2020 (Annexure-5)

has been filed before the Managing Director, Bihar State Text Book Publishing Corporation Limited (respondent no. 3), which is still pending.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, submits that it will suffice if a direction is given to the Managing Director, Bihar State

Text Book Publishing Corporation Limited (respondent no. 3) to dispose of the aforesaid representation on merits expeditiously.

6.

Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 appears and states that there is no objection to the proposal of the petitioner.

7.

Having regard to the stand of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Managing Director, Bihar State Text Book

Publishing Corporation Limited (respondent no. 3) to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s aforesaid representation dated 23.04.2020

(Annexure-5), if still pending, on its own merits in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, expeditiously and in

any event within a period of three weeks from today.

8.

It is made clear that in view of the ongoing lockdown and corona virus pandemic, the respondent no. 3 shall be at liberty to hear the petitioner

through video conference and any correspondence may be made through email. To enable the same, the petitioner undertakes to furnish his mobile

phone number and e-mail ID to the respondent no. 3 without delay.