High CourtsDivision Bench

M/S Sikkim Urja Limited vs M/S Abir Infrastructure Private Limited And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 22 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 SIK CK 0085

HON’BLE JUDGES
Biswanath Somadder, CJ · Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Appeal No. 01 Of 2024

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 135 words

Biswanath Somadder, CJ

Having heard the learned Advocate representing the appellant, we are of the view that this appeal is required to be heard only after all pleadings and records that were before the learned Commercial Court at Gangtok, are before us. Further, the presence of all respondents are required. However, only respondent no.2 is represented at this stage.

We, therefore, direct the Registry to ensure that all pleadings and records which were before the learned Commercial Court at Gangtok are before this Court on the next date.

The appeal shall appear for further consideration on 26th April, 2024, under an appropriate heading.

In the meanwhile, the learned Advocate-on-Record representing the appellant shall file an affidavit of service indicating effective service of notice together with copies of Arbitration Appeal No. 01/2024 upon all the respondents.