High CourtsDivision Bench

M.S. Varghese and Others vs Rajeev Kumar Khera and Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 2 May 2002 · Citation: (2003) ACJ 2140 : (2003) ILR (MP) 899 : (2002) 4 MPHT 535 : (2002) 3 MPLJ 607

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhawani Singh, C.J · Ajit Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 168, 171, 173
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 25/99
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 781 words

Bhawani Singh, C.J.

This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jabalpur, in Claim Case No. 70/1995, dated October 27, 1998.

Happen Varghese was the only son of the claimants 1 and 2. At the time of accident, he was 23 years old. He had completed B.Sc. course from Calicut University (Kerala) and was doing MBA course at Jabalpur. It is alleged that the deceased had a bright future and could earn salary of Rs. 10,000.00 per month.

Unfortunately, on 15-9-1995, when he was going on his motor cycle towards Jabalpur, truck bearing registration No. MP-20-A/4522, driven rashly and negligently by Namo Narayan (Driver), dashed against the motor cycle of deceased. As a result of this accident, Happen Varghese died. The vehicle was owned by Rajeev Kumar Khera and was insured with the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Jabalpur. Compensation of Rs. 43,38,800.00 is claimed under various heads like future prospects of earning, mental loss, mental shock etc.

Owner and driver remained absent. They were proceeded ex-parte, while Insurance Company denied the claim and alleged that Business Administration Course in Jabalpur is not affiliated with the New Port University of California (U.S.A.); future of the deceased was not bright as claimed, therefore, he could not start with the salary of Rs. 10,000.00 per month; and Namo Narayan was not driving the truck rashly and negligently, nor did it cause the accident, therefore, allegations to this effect have been denied. It is further stated that deceased was a non-earning member of the family, therefore, claimants 1 and 2 were not entitled to get compensation from the Insurance Company. Moreover, it was head-on-collision between the two vehicles, therefore, owner of motor cycle No. MP-20-J-9064 and Insurance Company are necessary parties to the case, being based on contributory negligence.

As many as 8 issues were framed by the Claims Tribunal on pleadings of parties and after recording evidence, it came to the conclusion that the accident took place as alleged, due to rash and negligent driving of the truck. Compensation of Rs. 1,51,000.00, carrying interest at the rate of 12% per annum is awarded.

The first two claimants are the parents of the deceased, while the third is their representative. They are not satisfied with the award, therefore, this appeal for enhancement of compensation.

There is no dispute with regard to taking place of the accident and death of Happen Varghese as a result thereof. Evidence also establishes taking place of the accident due to rash and negligent driving of the truck by Namo Narayan, driver of Rajeev Kumar Khera and insured with Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The dispute is with regard to determination of compensation.

Shri A.K. Jain, learned Counsel for claimants submits that Claims Tribunal has not assessed just compensation in this case after taking into consideration the age, qualifications and future prospects of the deceased, therefore, inadequate compensation has been paid. Reliance is placed on the Apex Court decision in case of Chinnama George and Others Vs. N.K. Raju and Another, ].

Shri Rakesh Jain, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3, with usual vehemence, submits that the Claims Tribunal has not committed any error in determination of compensation in this case; deceased was not a brilliant student, therefore, could not have earned the income alleged by the claimants, assuming that he completed the MBA course in question.

Counsel for parties submit before us many ponderables and imponderables in support of their respective cases. Shri Rakesh Jain brought to our notice decisions in case of T.C. Bhatia Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others, Savitri Khanna and Ors. v. SushilJain and Ors. ; and Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and Another Vs. Biplesh Kumar and Another, .

Giving serious consideration to the matter, we are of the opinion that the Claims Tribunal has not determined just compensation in this case. Admittedly, deceased had passed B.Sc. Examination from University of Calicut (Kerala). He was keen to study further, therefore, he had travelled all along to Jabalpur to do higher course in MBA Obviously it is expected that he would have completed the course, settled in service and earned reasonable salary, but unfortunately, young life has been cut short by this accident. However, looking to all the ponderables and imponderables of human life, it would be just and proper to award lump sum compensation of Rs. 3,00,000.00 (Rs. Three lacs) to the claimants 1 and 2, parents of the deceased. Since the vehicle was insured with the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., the liability to pay compensation shall be that of the Insurance Company. The enhanced amount of compensation will cany interest at the rate of 9% per annum.

Costs on parties.