High CourtsSingle Bench

Mubbas vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 20 September 2024 · Citation: (2024) 09 KL CK 0045

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.G. Ajithkumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 · Kerala Abkari Act 1 of 1077 — Section 55(a), 55(i), 58
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 7484 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 374 words

P.G. Ajithkumar, J

1.

This is an application for bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

2.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.579 of 2024 of Kodakara Police Station, Thrissur. He allegedly had committed the offences punishable under Sections 55 (a), 55(i) and 58 of Kerala Abkari Act I of 1077.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4.

The prosecution allegations are that, the petitioner at 3.40 P.M. on 06.07.2024 was found in possession of 160 litres of Indian made foreign liquor kept in a car bearing Registration No.KL-7-BF-7200 at Nellayi, Ulumbathukunnu, and he possessed the same for the purpose of the sale.

5.

The petitioner would contend that he did not involve in the alleged crime and without any material or evidence, he has been implicated in the crime. He is innocent. The investigation in the matter has been progressed considerably and there is no reason or justification for his further detention.

6.

The learned Public Prosecutor would submit that considering the seriousness of the offence and the possibility of interfering with the investigation by the petitioner in the event of his release on bail, this petition deserve only to be dismissed.

7.

The petitioner was arrested on 06.07.2024 and he has been in judicial custody since 07.07.2024. The final report was already filed in the matter. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, and considering the nature and gravity of the offence, further detention of the petitioner is unnecessary.. I am therefore of the view that the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the bail application is allowed and the petitioner is granted bail on his executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), with two solvent sureties for the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, subject to the following conditions:

(i) He shall not influence or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence;

(ii) During the bail period, he shall not get involved in any offence.

In case of breach of the bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bail before the jurisdictional court.