AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
33 paragraphs · 729 wordsThe petitioner states that he is the absolute owner in title and possession of property having an extent of 80 cents comprised in various survey
numbers and situated within the limits of Thamarakkulam Village. The petitioner decided to put up a residential building in the said property for which
purpose, he approached the Panchayat and obtained Ext.P1 permit. Based on his application, Ext.P2 development permit has also been issued by the
Panchayat. Since some amount of earth is to be removed, he approached the Department of Mining and Geology and by Ext.P3 pass, the petitioner
was permitted to remove 610 m3 of earth subject to various conditions. When the petitioner commenced work on the property, obstruction was caused
by the party respondents. They were of the view that the petitioner would bring in large vehicles and encroach upon their property which is lying on
either sides of the pathway leading to the property of the petitioner. He contends that the vehicle was obstructed and the respondents have taken an
illegal stand that they would not permit the petitioner to carry out the construction. In the said circumstances, the petitioner approached the 3rd
respondent and lodged a complaint. When no action was taken, he had to approach the 2nd respondent with the very same grievance. Complaining of
inaction, the petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to afford adequate protection to the life of the petitioner and for
removing red earth from his property in accordance with the permits issued by the local authority as well as the Geologist, without any threat or injury
from the party respondents.
Notice was served to the party respondents. There is no appearance.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that based on the complaints lodged by the party respondents, the permit issued to the
petitioner was cancelled and the same was challenged before this Court. This Court by Ext.P6 judgment, set aside the order and directed the
panchayat to reconsider the same. It is stated that Ext.P7 order was later issued by the Panchayat restoring the construction permit. It is further
stated that the department of Mining and Geology has issued Ext.P8 permit by which, the petitioner has been permitted to remove 610 m3 of ordinary
earth for the purpose of levelling the land. The permit is valid from 18.1.2021 to 22.1.2021. It is stated that the petitioner will have to remove the earth
during the period permitted by the Geologist and prays that necessary directions be issued to the police to grant protection to the petitioner to carry out
the work.
The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that the grievance of the local residents is that the petitioner would bring in 15 ton
vehicles to remove the sand and if the same is done, the pathway leading to the property would be destroyed. They also have a grievance that some
damages would be caused to the property lying on either side of the pathway. To prevent such occurrences, the petitioner be directed to bring in
vehicles with a maximum load of less than 7 tons.
I have considered the submissions advanced. I find that the petitioner secured permits from the local authority as well as the Geologist for carrying
out constructions and also for removing the earth. Though notice was served on the party respondents, none appears. From the submissions of the
learned Government Pleader it appears that the apprehension of the local residents is that the petitioner would bring in large vehicles and cause
damage to the pathway and boundary. To safeguard the interest of the nearby residents, necessary directions can be issued to the petitioner to use
vehicles with less than 7 ton capacity to remove the earth. As the petitioner is armed with all permits, there is no justification on the part of the party
respondents in causing any obstruction to the construction. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the police to afford
adequate protection to the life and property of the petitioner and also to ensure that no illegal obstruction is caused to the construction activities carried
out in terms of Exts.P7 and P8. The petitioner shall use vehicles with a maximum load of upto 7 tons to remove the sand.
This writ petition is disposed of.
