AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 509 wordsDr. Kauser Edappagath, J
This is an application filed u/s 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.2/2023 of Koppam Police Station, Palakkad. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 342, 450, 363, 376(2)(n) of Indian Penal Code and Sections 4(1) read with 3(a), 6(1) read with 5 (1) read with 11 (iv) of POCSO Act.
The prosecution case in short is that, the petitioner trespassed into the house of the victim and sexually assaulted her on several occasions from the month of May, from July to December 2022 at her house and also at various places of Thrissur and Palakkad District and thereby committed the offences as alleged.
Heard both sides and perused the case diary.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that there are no materials to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and hence he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. He contended that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the petitioner and if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would affect the course of investigation.
A reading of the statement of the victim under Section 164 of Cr.P.C would show that, the petitioner and the victim fell in love and they voluntarily went to several places at Thrissur and Palakkad and had some consensual sex. The FIS further shows that, the victim allowed the petitioner to enter her room in the midnight on three occasions and they had consensual sex. The petitioner was aged 23 years and the victim was aged 17 years at the time of consensual sex. The petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 02.01.2023. In view of the nature of the crime and the stage of investigation, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the petitioner is required for any purpose. The investigation seems to have reached a fair stage.
For all these reasons, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail on conditions.
In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation.
(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Saturday until further orders. The petitioner shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required by him.
(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of like nature while on bail.
(v) The petitioner shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to tamper with the evidence or
