AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
44 paragraphs · 389 wordsThe petitioner herein is the 2nd accused in O.R
No.4/2017 of the Ottappalam Forest Range, registered
under Sections 27 (1)(d) (e), (iii & iv), and 47 (C)(F) (G) (H),
52 and 84 of the Kerala Forest Act. He seeks regular bail
under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The
application filed by him for regular bail was dismissed by
the learned Sessions Judge Palakkad on 21.10.2017. The
petitioner has been in judicial custody since 3.10.2017.
The prosecution case is that on 3.10.2017, the
1st accused cut and removed some sandal wood tree from
the Government forest, and he made an attempt to sell the
sandal pieces to this petitioner.
The report of the Investigating Officer is that the
tree was in fact cut and removed by the 1st accused, and
this petitioner was arrested on the suspicion that he offered
to purchase the sandal pieces from the 1st accused. The
sandal pieces were in fact seized from the possession of the
1st accused.
On a perusal of the materials, I find that the
Forest Range Officer has collected necessary materials as
against the petitioner herein and as against him,
investigation is practically over. The main allegations are
against the 1st accused, who cut and removed the sandal
wood tree from the Government Forest. In the above
circumstances, I feel it appropriate to grant bail to the
petitioner, when the charge against him is not definite or
simply that he agreed to purchase the sandal wood pieces.
In the result, this application for bail is allowed. The
petitioner will be released on bail on his executing bond
with two solvent sureties for 40,000/- (Rupees Fifty
thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the court below
having jurisdiction. Bail is granted on condition that;
a. The petitioner shall report before the
Investigating officer 10.00 a.m and 11 a.m on all Saturdays
for a period of two months.
b. The petitioner shall not leave the limits of the
Ottappalam Forest Range for two months.
c. The petitioner shall not in any manner influence
or intimidate the witnesses and he shall not have any
contact with the material witnesses directly or over
telephone or otherwise.
d. The petitioner shall not involve in any offence
punishable under the Kerala Forest Act, till trial of the case is
over.
