High CourtsDivision Bench

Mukesh Kumar And Others vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 29 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 SHI CK 1026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Singh Thakur, J · Ranjan Sharma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Himachal Pradesh Municipal Election Rules, 2015 — Rule 6, 10, 10(6), 10(7)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5515 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

46 paragraphs · 598 words

Vivek Singh Thakur, J

1.

This petition has been preferred against allotment of Gandhi Nagar Ward in Municipal Council, Kullu to SC Category on the ground that such allotment is in violation of Rule 10 of Himachal Pradesh Municipal Election Rules, 2015, especially Sub Rule (6) and (7) thereof, which reads as under:-

"6. The wards reserved for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes on the basis of percentage of population shall be changed in the immediate next election and at the time of such next elections, the ward/wards, having next highest percentage of population shall be reserved for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and the ward earlier reserved shall be kept open to the general category and so on for subsequent elections.

Explanation:- General category for the purpose of these rules shall mean men or women or both belonging to this category."

7.

The reservation of seats for women shall be made by draw of lots after excluding the seats which have been reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates including women belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, as the case may be."

2.

Grievance of the petitioner is that previously in the year 2020, seat was allotted to Women and now it should have been allotted to General Category, instead of reserving it for SC.

3.

The petitioner has placed on record Annexure P-2 (Colly.), information received from the Senior Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Kullu, H.P., which includes Performa-I, wherein, reservation allotment of seat to different categories has been mentioned, which indicates that in previous elections and for ensuing elections seat in Gandhi Nagar Ward was and has been allotted as under:-

Sr. No

Ward No.

Name of Ward

Reserved for in 1995

Reserved for in 2000

Reserved for in 2005

Reserved for in 2010

Reserved for in 2015

Reserved for in 2020

Proposal for reservation SC/ST/OBC/

Women for 2026

1.

2.

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

11.

11

Gandhi Nagar

General

ST (Wom)

General

ST

ST

Women

SC

4.

From the aforesaid table, it is apparent that Gandhi Nagar Ward in 1995 was reserved for General, thereafter in 2000 for ST (Women), in 2005 for General, in 2010 for ST, in 2015 for ST, in 2020 for women and now it has been allotted to SC.

5.

As per Explanation to Rule 10(6), 'General Category for the purpose of these rules shall mean men or women or both belonging to this category,' meaning thereby that, in case, General Category seat is allotted to men or women or either of them, then it will be considered as seat allotted to General Category.

6.

As per aforesaid Rule 10(7), 'the reservation of seats for women shall be made by draw of lots after excluding the seats which have been reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates including women belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, as the case may be'.

7.

Accordingly, in view of Explanation to Rule 10(6), in the year 2020, seat was available for General Category may be as seat allotted to Women and this time, it has been allotted to SC Category and thus, there is no repetition of reservation roster with respect to Gandhinagar Ward.

8.

Therefore, the impugned reservation roster is not in conflict with Rule 10 of H.P. Municipal Election Rules, 2015.

9.

In view of above, we don't find any merit in the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.