High CourtsSingle Bench

Mukesh Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 12 June 2019 · Citation: (2019) 06 SHI CK 0008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 436, 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 279, 304A · Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 187
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 789 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 142 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

Present petition is under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking anticipatory bail in connection with F.I.R. No. 136 of 2019, dated 30.4.2019, registered at Police Station Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmaur, H.P. under Sections 279, 304-A Indian Penal Code read with Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2.

I have gone through the status report on record and heard learned counsel for the parties. All these offences are bailable in nature. Petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is maintainable only when the offences are non- bailable. Hence this petition is dismissed being not maintainable.

3.

Needless to say that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, the Investigating Officer is under legal obligation to release the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds in terms of Section 436 Cr.P.C.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.