AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
44 paragraphs · 437 wordsInstant petition has been filed by father of the alleged
detenue Karishma who has completed her post graduation and
indisputably has attained the age of majority.
The complaint of the petitioner is that she was missing since
4-1-2017 and left parents home without giving any information
and they tried to search but when her whereabouts could not be
made known to them at his instance MPR No.1 dt.7-1-2017 was
registered at Police Station Chaksu, Jaipur Rural and when no
satisfactory action was taken by the Investigating Officer in
tracing out the detenue, there was no other option left with the
petitioner except to approach this Court by filign instant habeas
corpus petition.
After notices were issued by this Court on 14-2-2017
although the matter was posted for 20-2-2017 but after the
detenue was recovered, in the morning today request was made
that since the deteue has been recovered permission be granted
for listing of the matter in the complimentary list and with consent
of the parties we granted the permission and the matter is listed
before us today in the complimentary list.
The detenue Karishma has been produced before the Court
and we took note of her wishes, although no formal statement has
been recorded but she has stated before the Court that she is
residing with Mahendra Kumar Jangid s/o Lallu Jangid who is not
only known to the detenue but also to her family members
including her parents and further stated she is not under illegal
custody, although she admits that she didn''t inform her parents
before leaving home on 4-1-2017 and has further stated that she
is not interested in going back to her parents and want to stay
with Mahendra Kumar Jangid S/o. Lallu Jangid.
Without examining the merits of the mater and taking note
of the admitted facts and the wishes of the detenue Karishma who
has attained the age of majority is certainly at liberty to go & stay
at the place of her choice and that apart there is no complaint
made by her against Mahendra Kumar Jangid S/o Lallu Jangid or
any other person.
In the given facts & circumstances, we consider it
appropriate to direct the respondents that let the detenue
Karishma D/o Mukesh Kumar Soni be made free and is at liberty
to stay at the place of her own choice and to avoid any untoward
incident which might occur, we further direct that adequate police
protection for reaching to the place of her residence be provided
to the detenue.
With these directions/observations, the habeas corpus
petition stands disposed of.
