High CourtsSingle Bench(2006) 06 MAD CK 0092

Mumtaj Begam vs G. Petha Perumal and The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 June 2006

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Sudhakar, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (NPD) No. 463 of 1999

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

38 paragraphs · 667 words

R. Sudhakar, J.—This present appeal has been filed against the order dated 7.10.1998 in M.A.C.T.O.P. No. 38 of 1998 on the file of the

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pondicherry at Karaikal, by the appellant/claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the

Tribunal.

2.

The case of the appellant/claimant is that by the rash and negligent act of the driver of the scooter bearing Registration No. TN-50/0294, the

appellant/claimant fell down, while she was walking and sustained multiple injuries. She was treated in the General Hospital, Karaikal. Case was

registered in Crime No. 6 of 1998 under Sections 279 and 338 I.P.C. by the Traffic Police, Karaikal. The further case of the appellant/claimant is

that she is a hawker earning a sum of Rs. 50/- to Rs. 60/- per day. A sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- is claimed as compensation.

3.

The Tribunal, relying upon Ex.A-1 copy of FIR, Ex.A-3 copy of Accident Inspection Report and other documents, came to the conclusion that

the driver of the scooter had caused the accident due to rash and negligent driving and answered the point No. 1 in favour of the

appellant/claimant.

4.

As regards the point No. 2, the Tribunal relied on Ex.A-9 disability certificate whereunder the claimant had suffered permanent disability to the

extent of 38.4%. Besides, it is also to be noted that the claimant had sustained fracture of both bones of left leg with 50% loss of left hip flexion

and 30% loss of left knee flexion and therefore, it was found that squatting was difficult and in addition to this, the claimant also suffered 1-1/2

inches shortening of left lower limb. Therefore, it was concluded that the claimant had suffered permanent disability to the extent of 38.4%.

However, while granting compensation, the Tribunal has taken into consideration that for any permanent disability, the minimum amount provided is

Rs. 25,000/- and therefore, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 30,000/- as total compensation. No amount was granted under any other head.

Not satisfied with the quantum of compensation, the claimant has preferred this appeal.

5.

It is not mandatory that in each and every case of permanent disability, only the minimum amount of compensation should be provided. The

minimum amount of compensation is a benchmark, while considering the case of compensation for permanent disability. Further, depending upon

the facts and circumstances of each case, the quantum of compensation should be determined proportionate to the percentage of disability. In this

case, the claimant has suffered 38.4% disability and therefore, it will appropriate if the amount of compensation is fixed on account of disability at

Rs. 40,000/-.

6.

Even though the claimant has sought for compensation under the heads, viz., medical expenses, extra nourishment, pain and suffering and

continuing pain and suffering, no amount has been granted by the Tribunal. The claimant is a street hawker and admittedly she has been earning Rs.

50/- to Rs. 60/- per day. Considering the fact that the claimant was hospitalized due to fracture, she would have been incapacitated and

consequently, there would be loss of income during the period of treatment.

7.

Taking into consideration, the disability and the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that no appeal has been filed by the

respondents, the interest of justice requires the following amounts shall be awarded as follows:-

Head compensation now granted

Transport and medical expenses Rs.5,000/-

Extra nourishment Rs.2,500/-

Pain and suffering Rs.5,000/-

Continuing pain and suffering Rs.5,000/-

Loss of income Rs.5,000/-

Accordingly, the total compensation payable to the claimant is enhanced from Rs. 30,000/- to a sum of Rs. 62,500/-. The claimant is entitled to

interest at 7.5% per annum on the enhanced compensation amount from the date of claim petition till date of payment.

8.

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed, modifying the award amount to Rs. 62,500/- with interest at 7.5% per annum only on the enhanced

compensation amount of Rs. 32,500/- from the date of claim petition till date of payment. No costs.