High CourtsSingle Bench

Muneer Alam vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 4 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 01 UK CK 0007

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 307, 452
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Application No. 1124 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 197 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Sri S.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, present for the applicant.

2.

Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State.

3.

Sri Manish Arora, Advocate, present for the complainant.

4.

Applicant Muneer Alam, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 337/2010, relating to offences punishable u/s 452 and 307 IPC, Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.

5.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

6.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the injuries on the person of injured show that she had suffered injuries only in the forearm and armpit. It is further submitted there is no injury on the vital part of the injured. Learned Counsel for the applicant further submitted that there is no criminal history of the applicant.

7.

In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail.

8.

Let applicant Muneer Alam be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing each of like amount to the satisfaction two of sureties, Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee.

9.

Bail application stands allowed.