High CourtsDivision Bench

Mutialla Rama Krushna And Another vs Additional Commissioner Of Settlement & Consolidation, Sambalpur And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 19 October 2022 · Citation: (2022) 10 OHC CK 0103

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ · Chittaranjan Dash, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 355 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 130 words
1.

From the impugned order dated 31st August 2017, passed by the learned Single Judge, it is plain that what was challenged in W.P.(C) No.15042 of 2017 by the present Appellants was an order of dated 13th January 2017, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation, Sambalpur in Revision Case No.1485 of 2012. This was plainly an exercise of jurisdiction by the learned Single Judge under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2.

As is the present writ appeal is not maintainable in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Nandini J. Shah (2018) 15 SCC 356.

3.

Leaving it open to the Appellants to seek other appropriate remedies in accordance with law the present writ appeal is dismissed...

................................................