Supreme CourtDivision Bench

Mysore Minerals Ltd. vs Fakeerappa

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 24 October 2016 · Citation: (2016) 10 SC CK 0101

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 133
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 10394 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31734 of 2016) (Arising out of CC No. 19583 of 2016)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 147 words

Kurian, J.—Permission to file special leave petition is granted.

2.

Delay condoned.

3.

Leave granted.

4.

This appeal has been filed by the beneficiary of the land acquisition in dispute.

5.

It is seen that the appellant herein was not a party before the High Court and in the Reference Court as well.

6.

Be that as it may, since the major grievance appears only on the enhancement of compensation by the High Court, we permit the appellant to file a review petition before the High Court.

7.

In case such a review petition is filed within thirty days from today, the same may not be dismissed on the ground of delay.

8.

Till the expiry of thirty days, no coercive steps shall be taken for execution of the impugned order passed by the High Court.

9.

In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of.