AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 252 wordsM. Jaichandren, J.—Heard Mr. S. Murugan, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, as well as Mr. K.M. Vijayakumar,
the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Respondents.
At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if
the representation of the Petitioner, dated 29.10.2010, is directed to be disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified
period.
The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this
Respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel
appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, the third Respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the Petitioner''s representation, dated
29.10.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner
is directed to submit a copy of the representation, dated 29.10.2010, along with a copy of this order, to the third Respondent. However, it is made
clear, that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
The writ petition stands disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.
