High CourtsSingle Bench

Nafe Singh vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 16 January 2004 · Citation: (2004) 2 DMC 255 : (2004) 1 RCR(Criminal) 784

HON’BLE JUDGES
Viney Mittal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 304B, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. 57881-M of 2003
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 142 words

Viney Mittal, J.—The petitioner is the father-in-law. A case under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been registered with the Police Station''Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat.

2.

I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

The allegations against the petitioner are that about 8 months prior to the date of occurrence i.e. on June 20, 2003, he along with his family members had taunted Mukesh (deceased) wife of Naresh for bringing inferior quality of gift at the time of the birth of the child.

4.

Without commenting upon the merit of the controversy at all and keeping in view the fact that the deceased had died of burns and no specific role has been ascribed to the petitioner by the prosecution, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge, Sonepat.