High CourtsSingle Bench

Naib Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 September 2006 · Citation: (2006) 4 RCR(Criminal) 272

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish Kumar Mittal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 34
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 45813-M of 2006
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 263 words

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.—Petitioner Naib Singh has filed this petition u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 10 dated 20.1.2006 under Sections 307/447/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Dialpura, District Bathinda.

2.

I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR as well as the order dated 26.5.2006, passed by Sessions Judge, Bathinda, whereby bail application of the petitioner has been dismissed.

3.

In this case, it has been alleged that the petitioner gave Kasia blow on the head of Nahar Singh complainant and this injury has been found dangerous to life. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the injured was discharged after five days. He further contends that in the alleged occurrence, the petitioner has also received injury, regarding which he has filed a complaint against the complainant party, in which they have been summoned to face trial. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.1.2006. He further submits that till now, out of fifteen witnesses cited by the prosecution, only two have been examined and the trial is not likely to conclude soon. These facts have not been disputed by the State Counsel.

4.

In view of the aforesaid facts and keeping in view the custody period of the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner. He is, accordingly, ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.