High CourtsSingle Bench

Naimuddin Ansari And Others vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 1 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 JH CK 0031

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 379 · Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention Of Illegal. Mining, Transportation And Storage) Rules, 2017 — Rule 13 · Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 — Section 21 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 8259 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 415 words

Anil Kumar Choudhary, J

Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.89 of 2021 registered under sections 379/34 of Indian Penal Code, Section 13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Rule and under Section 21 of MMDR Act.

The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that petitioner no.1 is the owner and petitioner no.2 is the driver of the tractor which was involved in transportation of illegally excavated sand. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.5000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Garhwa, in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.89 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.