AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 556 wordsVivek Singh Thakur, J
Petitioner(s) have approached this Court for bail under Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code (in short Cr.P.C.), in case FIR No.92 of 2019 dated 16.08.2019, registered under the provisions of Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act'), in Police Station Padhar, District Mandi, H.P.
Petitioner(s) are present in person and duly identified by Mr.H.S. Rangra, learned counsel.
Status report stands filed. The same is perused and taken on record.
As per status report, investigation is almost complete and challan has been presented in the Court.
On instructions, learned Additional Advocate General, submits that petitioner(s) have joined the investigation and nothing is to be recovered from them. Question of custodial interrogation is now over as the investigation is complete and challan has been presented in the Court.
Considering entire facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner(s) and by learned Additional Advocate General, I am of the opinion that no fruitful purpose is going to serve by keeping the petitioner(s) behind the bars and, therefore, interim bail granted on 02.03.2020 is confirmed, subject to furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, where challan has been presented, within two weeks from today, subject to further following conditions:-
(i) That the petitioner(s) shall make themselves available to the police or any other Investigating Agency or Court in the present case as and when required;
(ii) That the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. They shall not, in any manner, try to overawe or influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) That they shall not obstruct the smooth progress of the investigation/trial;
(iv) That the petitioner(s) shall not commit the offence similar to the offence to which they are accused or suspected;
(v) That the petitioners shall not misuse their liberty in any manner;
(vi) That the petitioners shall not jump over the bail; and
(vii) That they shall keep on informing about the change in addresses, landline numbers and/or mobile numbers, if any, for their availability to Police and/or during trial.
It will be open to the prosecution to apply for imposing and/or to the trial Court to impose any other condition on the petitioner(s) as deemed necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.
In case the petitioner(s) violate any conditions imposed upon them, their bail shall be liable to be cancelled. In such eventuality, prosecution may approach the competent Court of law for cancellation of bail, in accordance with law.
Trial Court is directed to comply with the adirections issued by the High Court, vide communication No.HHC.VIG./Misc. Instructions/93-IV.7139 dated 18.03.2013.
Observations made in these petition(s) hereinbefore shall not affect the merits of the case in any manner and are strictly confined for the disposal of the bail application(s). Petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Registry to transmit a copy of this order to the trial Court through E-mail.
Copy dasti.
