High CourtsDivision Bench

Nand Lal And Others vs Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 24 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 SHI CK 0067

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammad Rafiq, CJ · Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5896, 8196, 8206 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 487 words

Mohammad Rafiq, CJ

1.

These writ petitions have been filed by petitioners, who had retired from the service of the respondents–Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation (HPTDC), with the prayer that the respondents may be directed to pay the interest of Gratuity and Leave Encashment for the delay on the part of the respondents.

2.

Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated 25.08.2021, passed in CWP No. 4377 of 2021, titled Sh. Subhash Chand versus The Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla and others alongwith connected matters, in which, the respondents were directed to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioners within a period of six months. In case, the required retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioners within the aforesaid period of six months, then in addition to the due statutory benefits, the petitioners shall also be paid interest at the rate of 9% per annum beyond the period of six months till the date of actual payment.

3.

In another subsequent order of this Court passed in CWP No. 6034 of 2021, titled Ram Lal versus The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and another and the connected matter, decided on 23.11.2021, the respondents were directed to make payment of gratuity to the petitioners within a period of six months from the date of passing the order. In the event of non-payment of due amount, the petitioners were held entitled to differential amount of interest between the amount of interest statutorily payable to the petitioners as per the Payment of Gratuity Act and the interest at the rate of 9% per annum for the period of delay beyond six months.

4.

While disposing of Review Petition No.110 of 2021 on 25.11.2021, preferred against the order dated 09.11.2021 passed in CWP No.6928 of 2021, in which, the aforesaid order dated 25.08.2021 passed in CWP No.4377 of 2021 was relied upon, this Court has clarified the aforesaid order in the terms that the respondent-Corporation shall be liable to pay entire retiral dues of the petitioner, including gratuity, arrears of pension and leave encashment alongwith prescribed rate of interest, within a period of six months from the due date till the actual payment is made.

5.

We are, therefore, persuaded to dispose of these writ petitions with a direction to the respondents to pay interest of gratuity and leave encashment to the petitioners as per applicable rules, within a period of six months from today. The due amount of payment, if delayed beyond six months, shall be paid with interest to the rate of 9% per annum till the date of its actual payment. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.