High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 07 SHI CK 0251

Nand Lal vs Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 13 July 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Execution Petition No.285 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 414 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

By way of instant Execution Petition filed under Rule 16(1) of the H.P. High Court Original Side Rules, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to implement/execute the judgment/order dated 29.6.2018, passed by the Erstwhile H.P. State Administrative Tribunal in OA No.3673 of 2018, titled as Nand Lal versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others,

2.

Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, alleged to have been violated, (Annexure E­2), reveals that learned Tribunal below having taken note of the statement made by the learned counsel representing the petitioner that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered under the judgment dated 17.7.2014 rendered by this Court in CWP No.3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, directed the respondents/competent authority to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by this Court expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Since despite there being specific direction to do the needful within a period of three months, respondents have failed to grant the benefit to the petitioner in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in Nek Ram's case supra, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.

3.

Ms. Shubh Mahajan, learned counsel representing the respondents while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that though she has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid judgment/order alleged to have been violated, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of two weeks from today.

4.

Consequently, in view of the fair statement made by learned counsel representing the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment/order dated 29.6.2018 passed by learned Tribunal below in OA No. 3673 of 2013, positively within a period of two weeks, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged accordingly. Besides above, respondents shall also file compliance report in the Registry of this Court.