High CourtsDivision Bench

Nandan Prasad vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 21 September 2022 · Citation: (2022) 09 UK CK 0114

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vipin Sanghi, CJ · R.C. Khulbe, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 460 Of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 167 words

Vipin Sanghi, CJ

1.

None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called-out.

2.

The reliefs sought in the writ petition are the following:-

“I. Issue a writ order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 03.10.2015 passed by respondent no. 2 (contained as Annexure no. 1 to this petition).

II. Issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 to not to interfere in the peaceful and smooth functioning of the petitioner as Forest Ranger, Dharchula Forest Range falling under the administrative control of the Dy. Director Askot Wild Life Sanctuary Pithoragarh.”

3.

The operation of the impugned order dated 03.10.2015, whereby the petitioner was suspended, was stayed on the very first date of hearing i.e. 16.10.2015.

4.

The petitioner was 54 years’ old when he preferred the present petition in the year 2015. Therefore, he would have superannuated by now.

5.

This petition, therefore, appears to have become infructuous. It is disposed of as such.